
Glenn Beck’s recent rally at the Lincoln Memorial was on the anniversary of MLK’s “historic” I Have a Dream speech. What strikes me about that speech is how that one line about the “content of their character” has been taken entirely out of context. The speech was a typical exploration of racial grievances and identity politics – as was Martin Luther King Jr‘s entire political life.
Glenn Beck and the rest of the mainstream conservative movement don’t have time to do their homework and don’t care to get bogged down in facts. But most importantly, they so desperately want to have some legitimate claim to the “civil rights” bandwagon that they’ll imagine one where it doesn’t exist. They’ll continue to make fools of themselves, refusing to accept that conservative Whites simply aren’t welcome in Cosmic America.
Likewise, many White Advocates make the same mistake in relation to the mainstream conservative movement. They don’t do their homework, don’t learn the facts, and hold an illusory belief that the mainstream conservative movement secretly sympathizes with their racial goals. They exhort us to stop sharing our message and climb on the mainstream conservative bandwagon, deluding themselves into thinking that Glenn Beck is a secret friend of ours who’s engaged in some kind of elaborate strategery.
He’s not.
There are three basic facts one needs to know about Glenn Beck: he’s a “dry drunk”, a tireless self-promoter, and a latter day saint. The man’s not an intellectual, but he’s not exactly a demagogue, either. He’s a true believer. Beck is bursting with the passionate zeal of a man who overcame his personal demons through rebirth in Christ. His entire shtick is about wrapping the promotion of LDS tradition in a palatable mainstream conservative package, performed in the spirit of a recovered alcoholic hosting an AA meeting.
Like Lonesome Rhodes in the classic Andy Griffith movie A Face in the Crowd, Beck has a preternatural ability to connect with ordinary White Americans. He has better instincts than O’Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh because he truly is an ordinary White American. The rest of them are ideologues, intellectual elites pretending to be “one of us”. With Beck, it’s sort of the opposite: an ordinary man pretending to be an ideologue. He leads from the rear of the conservative zeitgeist, patiently and persistently pulling the tea party movement toward Cleon Skousen’s Radical Americanism.
Cleon Skousen was a Mormon FBI agent and constitutional scholar who formalized and systematized the LDS tradition of American exceptionalism, embracing the U.S. Constitution as a divinely-inspired sacred text, and believing that we have a prophesied mission of saving the country when the Constitution “hangs by a thread“. His book, The 5,000 Year Leap, along with three of his other books, is required reading in Beck’s nationwide network of “9/12″ groups.
I’m also a Mormon convert and I’m also a Radical Americanist. I believe, along with Glenn Beck and Cleon Skousen, that we as a people must return to our founding documents, our founding ideals, and our founding faith. But where we depart is my recognizing that we must also return to our founding people. A nation is united by more than tradition and transcendence, it’s also united by blood and kinship. Glenn Beck exhorts us to return to the wisdom of the founders on nearly every critical issue – save for one: race.
Despite my being a poor man’s Glenn Beck, despite my having a virtually identical ideological foundation and vision for America’s future, I won’t be climbing on his bandwagon. That wagon is heading off a cliff. The entire ordeal is a tragic waste of time and energy, one that will as surely result in the demise of our people and what we cherish as doing nothing at all. Beck and his influences have fully embraced modernity and cosmopolitan universalism in this one vital way, to the point of cravenly serving a Black Marxist radical’s anti-White and anti-American agenda.
It was Neocons who started the thing where “conservatives” would act like Martin Luther King was great, and that the Black leaders and Liberals of today were somehow perverting his legacy.
But at least those Neocons were at least pretending to be saying this in order to justify rhetorical opposition to that which is called Affirmative Action.
They’d constantly take that one line by MLK about judging people as individuals out of context, and use it to say that MLK would’ve been against Affirmative Action.
It was really stupid; but when you get down to it still intelligent and daringly un-pc in comparison to what Beck is doing.
Matt,
Glenn Beck is already a poor man’s Glenn Beck, although you might be able to make inroads if you can learn to weep on command.
I’m curious to know, what is your basis for linking Christianity with racialism? For my conservative family (Buckley, not Beck), Christianity produces quite the opposite effect. Cited examples for this belief include Galatians: 15:28-29:
There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Also, Matthew 25:40:
The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.
The only way that I can think to reconcile these two concepts is if one has the belief that racial segregation is beneficial to all persons, but that would seem to imply that working towards that goal means advocating for universal segregation, rather than just advocating for one’s own people.
Matt-
Do you share the exact same ideological foundation and vision for America? Glenn Beck is a rabid libertarian, he is a fanatical supporter of the Cato institute, a propaganda organization run by jewish billionaires.
“It appears that far from being unaware of, or alarmed by, Beck’s praise…the Cato Institute are Beck’s friends and regular have been his guests.
Does the Cato Institute endorse Beck’s outrageous behaviour, or does it merely see his national TV audience as a useful way to get inside the homes of millions of Americans?
It doesn’t really matter. For they say that you can tell a lot about a man by the company he keeps, and why should different rules apply to think tanks?
Of course, somebody might cynically suggest that the Cato Institute isn’t so much a think tank as a front organisation to protect and enhance the privileges of America’s elites (JEWS) whilst giving faux-intellectual credence to self-serving policies dreamed up by the most extreme of rightwing Republicans.”
http://badconscience.com/2009/08/16/glenn-beck-and-the-cato-institute/
More on the Cato Institute and the Koch brothers here:
http://www.observer.com/2010/slideshow/131739/communist-shipbuilding
And here:
http://www.observer.com/2010/daily-transom/how-libertarian-koch-bros-benefit-corporate-welfare
Again proving it is the nation-destroying bankers and billionaires (mostly jewish) that are the real welfare recipients. These are the billionaires Glenn Beck is a spokesperson for. It is disgusting to dupe people into loving their slavery, misery and poverty!
Nations don’t go bankrupt because of social welfare. Nations go bankrupt because of liberal economic policies that benefit billionaires and their middle class minions, who would rather destroy the nation then expose the real criminals.
Also see:
“Sarah Palin: Libertarian”
http://www.libertarianrepublican.net/2008/09/sarah-palin-passes-catos-libertarian.html
True believers or money grubbers?
You have to know who are those who are “in Christ Jesus”. It is a Spiritual condition of being that only a few have experienced. You have to realize the New Testament divides “believers” into two classes; children/babies and adults, which are called sons. Passages meant for sons do not apply to children/babies until they become adult sons. Those who are “in” Christ Jesus are adult sons who have been “born of God”. Babies and children are still in the “womb” which is the darkness of limited understanding and therefore see as Paul said in another place, “in part”.
Randy,
Christ rejected the assertion that he was the king of the Jews because his kingdom was not of this world. Similarly, universal brotherhood in Christian faith is transcendent, not temporal. Were his intention to abolish the worldly kingdoms, I believe he would have been more direct in asserting such a profound thing. Were this the obvious interpretation, I believe that interpretation would have been taken seriously in theological circles before the last few decades of Christian thought.
I’m not a sola scriptura Christian and I integrate my understanding of Christ’s teachings with inspired teachings that came before and after him.
Where Christianity is pivotal here isn’t in establishing that humans generally exist in discrete tribes, ethnicities, and nation; that’s taken for granted in scripture, corroborated by contemporary biology, and simple common sense in nations that aren’t on the cosmic kool-aid. It’s pivotal in instilling the spirit of stewardship and charity that makes a nation great. It’s pivotal in instilling the spirit of sacrifice that must exist for our people, the White American people, to unite as one and face the grave challenges before us.
Lena,
I don’t share Beck’s enthusiasm for libertarianism. Though I was under the impression that his enthusiasm for it is less than “rabid”, that he sort of suffers from fits of libertarianism then swings back toward social conservatism. I’ll follow up on your sources and will work on having a more informed opinion on this topic.
Matt – Thought you might be interested in reading Constitution Hanging by a Thread – the “only known contemporary account of this well-known prophecy of Joseph Smith.” Let me know what you think. Although I do not follow Glen Beck, he seems to have reawakened in people a desire to become familiar with the founding principles of the republic.
Do not look to the sources I provided for proof of Glenn Beck’s affinity and rabid, ugly defence of economic liberalism, just read his books.
And see here, this blasphemous and a blatant mockery of Christianity!
“Glenn Beck Compares BP Oil Spill Hearing to Christians Being Fed to the Lions!”
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/video-glenn-beck-compares-bp-oil-spill-hearings-to-christians-being-fed-to-the-lions
Lena,
I’ve watched him several times and never heard him say anything that absurd. I also didn’t see him selling libertarian economics.
It appears I had an unrepresentative sample.
I definitely don’t support that kind of groveling to the multinational corporations and I’ve gone on record more than once against libertarian ideology.
So Glen Beck supports international, free market economic liberalism: economic Marxism and anti-racism: social Marxism – the social conservatism is to be found WHERE?????
It’s to be found in his promotion of Skousen’s works.
My impression of his ideological bent seems to be in agreement with the guy who wrote the wiki, at the very least.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Beck#Ideological_influences
I objected to his promotion of social Marxism, to the point of dismissing any potential for following or supporting Beck. I’m not suggesting that anybody ought to support Beck. In fact, I did the opposite.
I agree with Beck to the extent that he agrees with the aggressively conservative and nationalist writings of Skousen and similar ideologues. If that’s “not at all”, then I don’t agree with Beck at all.
Matt,
I am merely pointing out that you are insulting my intelligence by comparing yourself to Glenn Beck. You, I like, for him I feel nothing but contempt. It is appropriate that Glenn Beck compares himself to the subversive communist MLK, because he is a subversive communist as well! I do not see you that way.
More on the Koch Brothers: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer
Lena,
Thanks. Were you affected by the recent earthquake?
Yes, I was affected by the quake. I had my entire house packed ready to relocate to Christchurch, I now am planning to move to Auckland. Oh well, New Zealand is not called the shaky islands for nothing. See, I am more Kiwi by the day…
Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: Diversity Edition (NSFW)
Pingback: American Restoration Fashion | Counter-Currents Publishing
Pingback: Matt Parrott, "The Adult in the Room" | Counter-Currents Publishing
Matt,
In light of your comments here, what is your reaction to this?
http://www.antiwhitemedia.com/2011/12/mormons-love-black-people-too.html
AnalogMan,
There are different strains and factions within the church. There’s certainly an anti-White globocorp multicult faction and it definitely has the momentum.
That’s horrible! Yechh! They are actually going against the Aaronic priesthood manual on marriage, which recommends that spouses be of the same race:
http://lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=1f4fa41f6cc20110VgnVCM100000176f620a____&vgnextoid=5158f4b13819d110VgnVCM1000003a94610aRCRD
“We recommend that people marry those who are of the same racial background generally, and of somewhat the same economic and social and educational background (some of those are not an absolute necessity, but preferred), and above all, the same religious background, without question” (“Marriage and Divorce,” in 1976 Devotional Speeches of the Year [Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 1977], p. 144).
I can’t find the reference now, but months ago I followed a link, I think from here, to a blog called mormonmen, which had an interesting article. It said that conservative Mormons were in danger of being considered apostate as the church changed its positions. The example given was welfare.
Until quite recently, the church’s position was that members in financial difficulty should look first to their families, and, failing that, to the church for help; never the government. Now, the instruction is to exhaust all government avenues before turning to the church.
I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that, as more and more Mexicans migrate to Utah for the free goodies, the church becomes more Mexican and has now decided that it believes in “obeying, honoring and sustaining the law” – excepting immigration laws. But it makes it hard to take seriously their claim to be led by revelation, when they blow with every liberal wind, just like all the other churches.