
Keep White Advocacy a Secret!
When you’re trying to poison somebody, you want to be sneaky about it. When somebody is trying to poison you, you want to be loud about it. The Jewish strategy of patiently infiltrating and subverting our mainstream institutions is necessarily secretive and relies heavily on crypsis because it’s the work of a small minority of hostile outside agitators. While Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals contains plenty of solid practical advice for the budding community organizer, his strategic situation was so dramatically different from our own that a simplistic attempt to mimic his methods simply won’t work for us.
We White Advocates are not a small minority of hostile outside agitators intent on poisoning the traditional American way of life. We’re still a small minority, but we are – more than any other political faction – interested in the welfare of our target audience. Unlike Saul Alinsky’s radicals, we don’t need to be secretive about our motives because we don’t intend to politically, socially, and even physically replace our targets. Our enemies are deceiving persuadables about our motives, a challenge we must take on directly. Lying about our motives as a tactic to work around somebody lying about our motives is to retreat from the high ground of being honest about our motives.
When Saul Alinsky’s radicals infiltrated White American institutions, it was the work of a clever and close-knit tribe deceiving a naive and disorganized mob. We White Americans, including our own small vanguard of ethnopatriots, are still naive and disorganized relative to the Jewish usurpers and their henchmen. To attempt an Alinskyite infiltration of their controlled institutions at this point is to go outside the experience of [our] people and will assuredly result in confusion, fear, and retreat.
The alternative is simple: advocacy. If persuadables haven’t seen the light, maybe we need to shine it brighter. Our people don’t yet realize they need advocates, but they will. When circumstances force our people to look around for credible and competent advocates, we need to be ready. There’s already been a sea change in popular attitudes about race and immigration. The multicult fad has definitively jumped the shark among working class White Americans. We have the momentum.
For the first time in several decades, it’s possible to have a serious conversation about race with ordinary people. With every passing year, more neighborhoods are destroyed; More American workers are replaced by immigrants; More American jobs are shipped overseas; More lives and families are destroyed by Black and Hispanic violence; More young men and women who’ve died in the desert for Israel are scooped into a box, draped with the stars and stripes, and returned to sender.

Is Gagging Ourselves a Clever Strategy?
These things add up.
Fifty years ago, George Lincoln Rockwell shouted that our White American country will be replaced with non-Whites and controlled by Jews…and nobody listened. Now the non-Whites, the Jews, and the Census Bureau are delivering this same message…and people are finally starting to listen. This forecasted replacement of us as a people is being celebrated as a fait accompli by our immigrant overlords, overlords who presume that the White American people will continue believing that the clever thing to do is shut up and blend in.
Yes, OK: the WN meat in this sandwich is fine. But it has to it has to be wrapped in hardright traditionalist and patriotic bread. It’s not about “fooling” the Jews; can’t be done. It is about getting strayed whites to, step-by-step, realize their own interests and act accordingly.
dragon,
It’s being proposed that people not explicitly advocate for White people and their interests, that people resign themselves to accomplishing as much as they can without getting “caught” with the forbidden belief.
Everybody agrees that we should meet people where they’re at. But once you go where they’re at, do you secretly and subtly pull them in the direction of White Advocacy under the guise of civil rights and anti-racism? Or do you slowly and patiently make your case for our membership in the White American national family and our need to fight for it?
Oh, and if anybody hasn’t seen Roissy’s United States of Autoimmunity, please do…
https://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/the-united-states-of-autoimmunity/
The Left, the Jews, etc. already accuse “implicit” pro-white organizations like normal conservative groups and immigration reformers (Minutemen) as “neo-nazis”. It doesn’t matter how much you tame your rhetoric – you’ll still be called a racist.
That means we can’t infiltrate anything.
The Jews only succeeded in infiltrating American institutions because we had an open meritocratic system. In the late 1920s Harvard was already ~30% Jewish. We let them get in. The Jews aren’t going to give us the same opportunity. As soon as they gained enough influence they began writing books and articles about how “racist” and “discriminatory” our WASPy system was.
Now, assuming we could even elbow our way into this rotten system, how would we successfully shift public opinion? You would soon find out that there exists a limit to your freedom of speech under the Jews. Move too close to this limit and you’ll be unemployed. (Remember Sam Francis? Joe Sobran?)
Teachable moments happen, just like those moments in the stock market when you KNOW that the price of oil or the price of gold is going to rocket up.
Dealing with people is a bit like dancing — sometimes you lead, sometimes you let them lead. Timing is important. Simply proselytizing to someone who isn’t ready, is irritating to them. You have to wait for a teachable moment, steer the conversation in a subtle way, and make them think that it was THEIR IDEA in the first place.
Forget using reason. Learn to speak in the language of sentiment. “Racism” is like a broken record, like an irritating jingle you’ve heard for years. Don’t you just roll your eyes when you hear the word “racism?” I know I do. (big mischievous smile) I don’t know about you, but I don’t feel guilty about ANYTHING, much less some thing called “racism.”
Imagine if someone could make you feel guilty because your last name is Smith, and people could make you pay them money because your name is Smith? Don’t you think there would be a Smith extortion movement out there? Of course! Like they used to say, “nice work if you can get it.” Whites have money, and you can make them feel guilty. What more do you need to know? If only we could make JEWS feel guilty!
The WN movement is very intellectualized, and that’s necessary for when we are talking among ourselves. But in talking to regular people, you have to talk in the language of feelings and joking around. I think the “racism is a scam/extortion movement” is a good approach, and lather it with talk about feelings, like how outrageous it is to be emotionally blackmailed.
mindweapon,
Right. When people want to know about the theory, they’ll ask about it. To try to persuade them with a blunt and bitter sermon is truly worse than not saying anything about it at all. I do believe that most working class conservative folks are willing to respect a person with an explicitly pro-White position.
I fear that we in the movement have sort of made caricatures of ordinary Americans and their racial views. Comments on the newspaper articles and blogs confirm that the true beliefs of the great majority are far closer to our worldview than many people realize.
All they really need is a gentle approach that doesn’t trigger their anti-White brainwashing, which is where NLP, patience, and tact come in.
I agree that you have to adjust your message depending on to whom you are speaking. Not only their ideological awareness level (or lack thereof), but how they are feeling that particular day etc. A degree in psychology would probably be helpful. :)
I read the Roissy article and liked it. From what I’d heard about that site, it consisted of a bunch of mentally adolescent, narcissistic morons with a complete lack of honor or feeling for family. I was wrong. Those guys are much more complex than that. They’re also retarded…
Pingback: Shut Up and Blend In? | Counter-Currents Publishing
Mindweapon writes, “… If only we could make JEWS feel guilty!…”
Since narcissists, in their own minds, are incapable of making mistakes, and since Jews are the penultimate narcissists at a group level, it’s impossible to make them feel guilt over their behavior toward non-Jews.
But it IS possible to create discourses that will make non-Jews think the Jews SHOULD be feeling guilty. The idea is to float memes which turn the Freudian tables on Jewish behavior.
One such idea is “SPD”, “Semitic Projection Disorder”. By turning a well-known proclivity of Jews to project their subjectively felt emotional state onto the object outside themselves into a “Disorder”, and giving it a name that sounds “scientific”, a weaponized discourse is put in play.
What is SPD? (notice the lack of sneer-quotes?)
SPD is a mental disorder which leads those who suffer from it to confuse their dislike of something someone else says with a quality inherent in the person saying it. SPD sufferers usually project by applying the label “anti-semitic” to whatever elicits a negative emotional reaction in their minds.
We must no longer accept “anti-semitic” as a legitimate category of discourse, but only as the expected distortion of reality put out by people who suffer from SPD. A person suffering from SPD is mentally ill, and their discourse must not be taken as an indicator of anything “real” … it’s no more than a madman’s ravings.
Carl Schmitt wrote that “A nation is first conquered when it acquiesces to a foreign vocabulary …” By accepting the ravings of people who suffer from SPD as “legitimate”, we allow them to label and define us with the results of their mental illness. We don’t take the ravings of paranoid-schizophrenics as “legitimate”, and neither should we accept the ravings of SPD sufferers as legitimate.
Almost all discourses where “anti-semitic” is used as a mindweapon against us are RIPE for insertion of the SPD meme, the statement that the person alleging “anti-semitism” is just projecting his mental and emotional state onto an external object, and is displaying his mental disorder by so doing.
Pingback: Shut Up and Blend In? « National Vanguard
Very good comment, Gregor! I’ll have to remember that disorder SPD. We need to apply to get that in the DSM-IV.
@GREGOR. That was brilliant. I am a fan.